Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nettlebeck v. Cumulus Media Inc.
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Justin Nettlebeck
Defendant:
Cumulus Media Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dean et al v. Cumulus Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04956
Plaintiff:
Demarland Dean, Kimberly Van Decreek, Bradley Kirk and others
Defendant:
Cumulus Media, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Alfonso v. Cumulus Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00847
Defendant:
John Does 1-10. and Cumulus Media, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dan Alfonso and Cara Chiappa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Palmeri v. Citadel Broadcasting Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00764
Plaintiff:
William Palmeri
Defendant:
Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and Cumulus Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Holzhei v. Cumulus Media Inc
as 2:2016cv11221
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Holzhei
Defendant:
Cumulus Media Inc
Counter_claimant:
Cumulus Media Inc
Counter_defendant:
Bonnie Holzhei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKE v. Cumulus Media Inc
as 2:2016cv11220
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BURKE
Defendant:
Cumulus Media Inc
Counter_claimant:
Cumulus Media Inc
Counter_defendant:
JOHNNY BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vickery v. Cumulus Broadcasting, LLC et al
as 6:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
David Vickery
Defendant:
Cumulus Broadcasting, LLC and Cumulus Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jason Rose v. Cumulus Media, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05247
Defendant:
Cumulus Media, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Jason Rose
Gelfand v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 0:2013cv01290
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Gelfand
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , MetLife, Inc. , Citadel Broadcasting Company and others
Mas v. Cumulus Media Inc.
as 3:2010cv01396
Plaintiff:
Brian Mas
Defendant:
Cumulus Media Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
