Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Steven Curry
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Mindi Nurse, . Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Monti et al
as 1:2023cv16541
Petitioner:
Michael Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Moore et al
as 2:2023cv01614
Plaintiff:
Antoine D Curry
Defendant:
Officer Deondre Moore, Sgt Schultz, CO Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flaugher v. Curry et al
as 3:2023cv03208
Plaintiff:
Douglas Flaugher
Defendant:
Brian Curry, Sue Heister, . Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie, Lamonte v. Martinson et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Lamonte L. Currie
Defendant:
Unit Manager Mr. Martinson, Robert Mann, Dean Gehring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Cerda et al
as 1:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Steven Curry
Defendant:
Mary Cerda, Adarberto Torrez and Mindi Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. SCHILLING et al
as 1:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
RACHAEL SCHILLING, HANNAH WINNINGHAM, J. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie, Lamonte v. Massen, T.
as 3:2022cv00622
Plaintiff:
Lamonte L. Currie
Defendant:
T. Massen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv05679
Plaintiff:
Jordan Jalil Curry
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections, Cook County Department of Corrections Cermak, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
