Cases 31 - 40 of 181
CURRIE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 2:2020cv00098
Plaintiff:
RYAN CURRIE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
WEISS v. CURRY
as 2:2019cv05862
Plaintiff:
ANGELA WEISS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
TAYLOR et al v. TUMOLO et al
as 2:2019cv04533
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAGSDALE, VERONICA TAYLOR, JULIUS BUTLER and others
Defendant:
JOHN CAHILL, JOE GILLESPIE, CARL WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CURRY v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2019cv02535
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THERESA DELBALSO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
REGINALD CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kawwalig v. Finances et al
as 3:2019cv00341
Defendant:
Officer Murry, Officer Finances, Chief Powers and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kawwalig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CURRY v. MCCANN et al
as 2:2018cv05444
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC., WARDEN BYRNES and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. CURRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURLEY et al v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05320
Plaintiff:
RENEE DOUGHERTY, MICHAEL WOOD, RANDY CURRIE and others
Defendant:
BAVARIAN MOTOR WORKS and BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
CURRY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2018cv00278
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY and others
Petitioner:
JOHN SCOTT CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv03221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
