Cases 11 - 20 of 916
Gutierrez Perez v. Monroe County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2023cv10110
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gutierrez Perez
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff's Office, Alexander Fierro and Connor Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Samantha Lanette Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Curry v. Miami Dade County et al
as 1:2023cv24506
Plaintiff:
Nathan Curry
Defendant:
Miami Dade County and A. Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Dominiqic I. Curry
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Sheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Shaull (CONSENT)
as 3:2023cv00654
Plaintiff:
Luther Curry
Defendant:
David M Shaull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Curry v. Shaull
as 2:2023cv00654
Plaintiff:
Luther Curry
Defendant:
David M Shaull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
John Curry v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13486
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN CURRY
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Bobby Curry v. Thomas Jenkins, et al
as 23-13388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS JENKINS, JENNIFER R. GRECCO, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY and others
Curry v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CURRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33076
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CURRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
