Cases 1 - 10 of 29
SMITH v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
TYRONE SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, GERMAYNE CURRY, SCOTT NICKELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARROD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CURRIE v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Defendant:
HENSLEY, BUELTEL, NATHAN HASSLER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LORENZO CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRIE v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00021
Defendant:
HENSLEY, BUELTEL, NICK SAMMET and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY L. CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. BARBER et al
as 1:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN
Defendant:
VIRGINIA CAUDILL, NATHAN PARTON, JOHN JAY BOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. DIENHART et al
as 1:2020cv03110
Defendant:
K. CUTCLIFF, PHIL BOWERS, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CURRY et al
as 1:2020cv03089
Plaintiff:
JUAN CHARLES LEVON SCOTT, KENNETH SCOTT, KENNETH LAMAR SCOTT, JR. and others
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, CURRY, MICHAEL STUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
