Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Easton v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Curtis D. Easton
Defendant:
T Oliver and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelgrift et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Robert Youngs Pelgrift, Jr. and Susan Curtis Pelgrift
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc, Stephen Keyes, Kristen Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ramos v. Poore et al
as 3:2022cv01533
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramos
Defendant:
Corey Poore and James Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 217, AFL-CIO et al
as 3:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Tina Curtis
Defendant:
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 217, AFL-CIO, City of New Haven and New Haven Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bloxam v. Low Cost Interlock, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00391
Defendant:
Commissioner, State of Connecticut and Low Cost Interlock, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Curtis Bloxam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyson v. New Haven et al
as 3:2021cv00326
Defendant:
Dan Renstrom, Leeha Timm, Curtis Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodowicz v. Rodowicz et al
as 3:2020cv01402
Defendant:
Joseph Rodowicz, Sr., Robert J. Darigan, Michelson, Kane, Royster & Barger, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Carter Rodowicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowman v. Dilworth et al
as 3:2020cv00756
Plaintiff:
Curtis Bowman
Defendant:
John Doe and Dilworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv01579
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Curtis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
