Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Robbins v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Steven J Robbins and Steven Joseph Robbins, Sr
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Sue, Room Care Tech and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOTEP-EL v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00059
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL and JOSEPH DUWAYNE TUNSTILL
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, RICHARD HAGENMAIEER, T. PHEGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOTEP-EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01567
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., JOE HOGSETT, DAVID ZIEMBA and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANTU v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2019cv00608
Respondent:
CURTIS HILL, JR., INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CANTU, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Summers v. Conway et al
as 3:2018cv00982
Defendant:
Angie Heishman, Kelly Mitchell, Joy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Summers and Charles B Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mcknight v. Elkhart City of et al
as 3:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
Myran D Mcknight, Sr
Defendant:
Elkhart City of, Elkhart City Police Department, Goshen City of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stephens et al v. Elkhart County Superior Court No 6 et al
as 3:2007cv00341
Plaintiff:
Michael Jack Stephens and Christopher Joe Stephens
Defendant:
Elkhart County Superior Court No 6, Stephanie Burgess, Elkhart County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEPHENS et al v. ELKHART COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. 6 et al
as 1:2007cv00671
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACK STEPHENS and CHRISTOPHER JOE STEPHENS
Defendant:
ELKHART COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. 6, CLERK OF COURTS STEPHANIE BURGESS, ELKHART COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
