Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cantrell v. Mathers et al
as 5:2021cv00216
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Shady
Defendant:
Marshall Mathers, Jeffery Curtis Jackson, Johnathan Matthew Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2015cv00220
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Curtis Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wayman Patterson v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-2432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYMAN PATTERSON, Also named plaintiffs, but did not sign complaint: Curtis Jackson #282320 and all prisoners similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections and THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections
Jackson v. Marriot et al
as 2:2013cv10827
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jackson
Defendant:
Marriot, B Foreman, B. Evers and others
Fharmacy Records, et al v. Salaam Nassar, et al
as 10-2073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FHARMACY RECORDS, aka Pharmacy Records Production Company, FHARM I PUBLISHING COMPANY and SHELTON RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALAAM NASSAR, CURTIS JACKSON, aka 50 Cent, DEF JAM RECORDING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-5834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fharmacy Records, et al v. Earl Simmons, et al
as 10-1354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FHARMACY RECORDS, aka Pharmacy Records Production Company, FHARM I PUBLISHING COMPANY and SHELTON RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALAAM NASSAR, CURTIS JACKSON, aka 50 Cent, DEF JAM RECORDING and others
Defendant:
EARL SIMMONS, aka DMX, DAVID STYLES, aka D.Styles, DARRIN DEAN, aka Dee and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
