Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Diarra v. Maddox et al
as 1:2021cv02882
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Dekalb County Inmate Classificatio, Dekalb County Custodian of Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diarra v. Cobb County Sheriff et al
as 1:2021cv00759
Defendant:
Detention Facility Sheriff, Sgt. Brown, Sgt. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agnone et al v. Camden County, Georgia et al
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Stephen Agnone , Enzo Agnone , Douglas Porcelli and others
Defendant:
Camden County, Georgia , Willis R. Keene, Jr. , Jimmy Starline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IN RE: Florida Cement and Concrete Antitrust Litigation [Indirect] Purchaser Action
as 1:2011cv04605
Movant:
Robert P. Alpert and Records Custodian for Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Plaintiff:
Jane Kerrigan , The Gables of Vero Beach Condominum Association and Helen Kelly
Defendant:
Cemex Inc., Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Tarmac America LLC and others
IN RE: Florida Cement and Concrete Antitrust Litigation [Indirect] Purchaser Action
as 1:2011mi00131
Movant:
Robert P. Alpert and Records Custodian for Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Plaintiff:
Jane Kerrigan , The Gables of Vero Beach Condominum Association and Helen Kelly
Defendant:
Cemex Inc., Florida Rock Industries, Inc., Tarmac America LLC and others
Ridley et al v. Donald et al
as 1:2007cv00177
Plaintiff:
Edward Tyrone Ridley and Detainees at Probation Detention Centers and Boot Camps in Georgia
Defendant:
James Donald, Andy Sellers, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejias Negron v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 2:2007cv00112
Petitioner:
Ramon Enrique Mejias Negron
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States and Bureau of Prisons Jesup Complex Custodian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
