Cases filed in Pennsylvania
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff: ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILBERT v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2020cv01858
Defendant: LINDA COHEN, JOY FLOWERS CONTI, MARGRET PICKENS and others
Plaintiff: JOSEPH R. FILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waymer et al v. Reed Eddy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01465
Petitioner: Mustafa Allah Waymer, Frederick Banks, Hamana and others
Respondent: University of North Carolina, Hank County Jail Sheriff, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. HICKTON et al
as 2:2015mc00885
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: DAVID HICKTON, ROBERT CESSAR, JUDGE MARK HORNAK and others
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01498
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. HICKMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01342
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: DAVID HICKMAN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. CONTI et al
as 2:2015cv01341
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: JOY FLOWERS CONTI, US DIST COURT FOR THE WEST DIST OF PA, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lancaster et al
as 3:2014cv01180
Plaintiff: Alton D. Brown
Defendant: Gary L. Lancaster, J. Curtis Joyner, Thomas J. Rueter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?