Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Panjabi et al v. KPRH IV Operations, LLC
as 1:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Raj Panjabi and Nawalkshore Panjabi
Defendant:
KPRH IV Operations, LLC doing business as CYPRESS GARDEN CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gloribel Turcios et al v. CPE HR, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv08653
Plaintiff:
Gloribel Turcios, Kamlesh Kumar and Yara Medina
Defendant:
CPE HR, Inc., Windsor Cheviot Hills, LLC, Windsor Care Center of Cheviot Hills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gloribel Turcios et al v. CPE HR, Inc. et al
as 2:2021mc01089
Plaintiff:
Gloribel Turcios, Kamlesh Kumar and Yara Medina
Defendant:
CPE HR, Inc., Windsor Cheviot Hills, LLC, Windsor Care Center of Cheviot Hills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Palermo v. KPRH IV Operations, LLC
as 1:2021cv05928
Plaintiff:
Michael Palermo
Defendant:
KPRH IV Operations, LLC d/b/a Cypress Garden Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Forever Green, Inc. et al v. Avatara, LLC
as 4:2021cv01090
Counter Defendant:
Forever Green, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UNITS Franchising Group, Inc., UNITS Mobile Storage of Charleston, Inc., UNITS Mobile Storage of Greenville, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Avatara, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv62245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Clark v. Cypress Gardening Services, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04690
Plaintiff:
Elvin Suazo Clark
Defendant:
Cypress Gardening Services, LLC and Scott D. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Talmadge v. Meadows at Cypress Gardens et al
as 8:2007cv01802
Plaintiff:
Denise Talmadge
Defendant:
Meadows at Cypress Gardens and Benjamin Castleberg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
