Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ALLEN v. MORGAN COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
CHERYL D. ALLEN
Defendant:
MORGAN COUNTY INDIANA, IU MEDICAL CENTERS OF IN and CENTER STONE
HOLLAND v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2014cv02065
Defendant:
D. ALLEN, B. LOVERIDGE and MICHAEL MITCHEFF
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWSAUGH v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2014cv01792
Defendant:
GREGORY D ALLEN, NICK BEAGLE, TAMARA BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN BREWSAUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2014cv01774
Plaintiff:
PATRICK D. ALLEN
Defendant:
JEFF CAPPA, CHRISTOPHER RYAN DAVIS, MICHAEL LYNN FRAME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLLAND v. CORIZON CORPORATION et al
as 1:2014cv01442
Defendant:
D. ALLEN, JOHN B. CLARKSON, CORIZON CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Mitcheff et al
as 3:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Allen
Defendant:
Mitcheff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Allen et al
as 3:2010cv00299
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kip D Allen, Christina M Allen, NJ View Exteriors Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ALLEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPT/JAIL et al
as 1:2007cv01006
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. ALLEN
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPT/JAIL, MONTGOMERY SUPERIOR COURT and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. HANKS
as 1:2007cv00729
Petitioner:
MICHAEL D. ALLEN
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
