Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Adams et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Robin D Adams and James Adams
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hendrix v. Fishman et al
as 3:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Lorin Fishman, Shannon Romero, Jennifer Kaufman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv07251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Northwest Building Components, Inc. v. Adams
as 1:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Northwest Building Components, Inc.
Defendant:
Philip D. Adams
Phillip Sanders v. V. Lai, et al
as 21-15074
Defendant / Appellee:
D. ADAMS, Deputy Public Defender, A. BOSNIAK, Probation Officer, JUSTIN WILLIAMS, Probation Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP EUGENE SANDERS
Sanders v. Deputy District Attorney V. Lai et al
as 1:2020cv00690
Defendant:
T. Eilers, B. Roberts, Justin Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guttman et al v. City of Las Vegas, Nevada et al
as 2:2019cv00964
Defendant:
Michele Fiore, Lois Tarkanian, Monica K. Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Josef Guttman and Ilana Guttman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rickey Reed v. D. Adams
as 19-16142
Respondent / Appellee:
D. ADAMS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY T. REED
Adams v. FBI San Francisco Field Office Supervisor and Agents
as 4:2019cv02977
Plaintiff:
Henry D. Adams
Defendant:
FBI San Francisco Field Office Supervisor and Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
