Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Sepeda v. Finner et al
as 4:2022cv02513
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sepeda
Defendant:
Chief Troy Finner, D. Adams, A. Trice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Raffery et al
as 9:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Tevin T Garrett
Defendant:
LeAnn Kay Raffery, Stephen Shires and Jeffrey D Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green and Lowell Dequincy Green
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Matt Johnson, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickey v. GVD Hyde Park, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00881
Defendant:
Justin D. Adams, GVD Hyde Park, LLC, Dixon Adams Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Geonna Rickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Galderma Laboratories, L.P. v. Adams et al
as 4:2020cv00260
Defendant:
Morgan Park Pharmacy and Perry D. Adams
Plaintiff:
Galderma Laboratories, L.P. and Galderma Laboratories LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Paxton et al
as 6:2019cv00565
Defendant:
Mark Staples, Charles O Meador, Pennie R Kempt and others
Plaintiff:
Mark D Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Almanza et al
as 6:2019cv00544
Plaintiff:
J D Adams
Defendant:
Amber Almanza, UTMB, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2019cv01240
Defendant:
L Lang, Dallas County Texas, J Garrison and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frey v. Davis et al
as 6:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
William Wallace Frey
Defendant:
Lori Davis, Ben G Raimer, Jennifer F Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillespie v. Basse et al
as 1:2016cv00204
Petitioner:
William B. Gillespie
Defendant:
David R. Basse, Marcia Odal, Michelle Hofmaier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
