Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins. v. Frederick Bailey
as 16-1866
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
FREDERICK D. BAILEY and CARL I. BRUNDIDGE
Defendant:
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP, ALAN E. SCHIAVELLI and PROTOSTORM, LLC
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins. v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout, Kraus
as 16-1853
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP and ALAN E. SCHIAVELLI
Defendant:
PROTOSTORM, LLC, FREDERICK D. BAILEY and CARL I. BRUNDIDGE
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins. v. Protostorm, LLC
as 16-1835
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
PROTOSTORM, LLC
Defendant:
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP, FREDERICK D. BAILEY, CARL I. BRUNDIDGE and others
Shiver v. BBBP, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00516
Plaintiff:
Mary Josephine Shiver
Defendant:
BBBP, LLC and Tony D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company v. Protostorm, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01485
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Protostorm, LLC , Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Krauss, LLP, Frederick D. Bailey and others
Counter_claimant:
Protostorm, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Erie Insurance Property and Casualty Company
as 5:2014cv23814
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Bailey, IV and Tanya B. Bailey
Defendant:
Erie Insurance Property and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyce et al v. City of North Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2007cv04015
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Boyce, Sr and Jeffery Boyce, Jr
Defendant:
City of North Charleston Police Department, Charleston, County of, North Charleston, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
