Cases 1 - 10 of 14
L. v. SAUL
as 3:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
DL, A Minor and D. L.
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Luecke et al v. Panera, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00176
Plaintiff:
Lauren Luecke, Drew Luecke, minor child, Andrew Luecke and others
Defendant:
Panera, LLC, Panera Bread Company and Panera, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D. v. ALLEN COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv01102
Defendant:
ALLEN COMPANY and WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Plaintiff:
D. L. D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
VELAZQUEZ et al v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2013cv01178
Plaintiff:
CARLOS AVALOS, SILVIA GARCIA and MARTHA VELAZQUEZ
Defendant:
DPG ENTERPRISES INC., EL MESON INC., EM 6 INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pupillo v. Gilbert et al
as 2:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Philip L Pupillo
Defendant:
David S Gilbert , Kemper Brothers Inc and D & L Leasing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kell et al v. Whitmyer et al
as 3:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Tina Kell and Tara Kell
Defendant:
A Whitmyer , D L Jones , Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCHERB v. CURLEY et al
as 2:2010cv00307
Defendant:
JIMMY D. CURLEY, D & L LEASING and TETON TRANSPORTATION, LLC
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. SCHERB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
FORD v. STINE
as 1:2010cv01203
Petitioner:
MARION L. FORD
Respondent:
D. L. STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAILEY v. STINE
as 1:2010cv00839
Petitioner:
DEREK BAILEY
Respondent:
D. L. STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HEGWOOD v. WRIGLEY et al
as 1:2010cv00525
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. HEGWOOD
Defendant:
M.C.F. MEDICAL PHYSICIAN, N.C.C.F. MEDICAL PHYSICIAN, N.C.C.F. MEDICAL SCREENING PERSONEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
