Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gregory Holt v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 12-3556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory Houston Holt, also known as Abdul Maalik Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, D W Tate, Captain, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Gregory Holt v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 12-3185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory Houston Holt, also known as Abdul Maalik Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, D W Tate, Captain, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Cowgill v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Cowgill
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Corizon, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Howard v. B E Collins, et al
as 11-2785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Curtis Ray Howard
Defendant - Appellee:
B. E. Collins, Assistanct Warden, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Bill Terry, Classification Supervisor, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Lori Freeman, Ms., Classification Officer, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Kenneth Pitts v. Murry, et al
as 09-3916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Ray Benton Pitts
Defendant - Appellee:
Murry, Dr., Cummins Unit, Moskovich, Dr., Cummins Unit, L. Cook, Ms., Cummins Unit and others
Pitts v. Murry et al
as 5:2009cv00350
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Murry, Moskovich, L Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazell v. Tate et al
as 5:2007cv00292
Plaintiff:
Michael Brazell
Defendant:
D W Tate, L Swopes and Gaylon Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Arkansas Board of Correction et al
as 5:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ray Mosley
Defendant:
Arkansas Board of Correction, Arnold, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
