Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13252
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
MOLSON v. SEYMOUR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00337
Defendant: MARCEL MALLORY, MICHAEL HOLMAN, R. KEVIN SUTTER and others
Plaintiff: ROWENA MOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOLSON v. BRYANT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00274
Defendant: FAITH HAUGHTON, MARCEL MALLORY, MICHAEL HOLMAN and others
Plaintiff: ROWENA MOLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
Rita D. Bryant v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2013cv01595
Defendant: Debra Battenfield, County of Riverside, James A Cox and others
Plaintiff: Rita D Bryant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-13165
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00813
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01430
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00415
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eugene Pringle, Jr. v. Hank Majetich, et al
as 09-35047
Plaintiff - Appellant: EUGENE DAYTON PRINGLE, Jr., Ex rel
Defendant - Appellee: HANK MAJETICH, Officer, NATHAN GARIBAY, KURPINSKY, Officer and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?