Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lee v. A. Parsain, et al
as 4:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lee
Defendant:
Isle of Wight Sheriff Department, Magistrate Judge Rachel L. Zollweg, Chief Judge James E. Weiser (JDR) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Mareno et al
as 2:2019cv00076
Defendant:
Dale Mareno and April Green
Plaintiff:
Stefan D. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Clarke
as 3:2018cv00747
Petitioner:
Vincent Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Harold D. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Almanza et al v. Brock et al
as 1:2018cv00607
Plaintiff:
Rolled Almanza and Laura Lizzet Almanza Miranda
Defendant:
Jillian Elizabeth Brock , Jeffry Dean Rima, Perry D. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Babar v. Clarke et al
as 1:2016cv00472
Petitioner:
Peter W. Babar
Respondent:
Karen D. Clarke and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaughan v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Dominique Vaughan
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Eperson, Shabazz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02652
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Clark and Christi L. Clark
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. , Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC , Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Karen et al
as 2:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Antoine D Clark
Defendant:
Nurse Karen and Sgt. Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Clark v. Hercules et al
as 2:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Antoine D Clark
Defendant:
W CWS Hercules, Nurse Bonney, Nurse Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00040
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Clark
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
