Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bettis v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv01112
Defendant:
Claire M. Gulmi, Christopher A. Holden, Envision Healthcare Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Bettis
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois and Central Laborers' Pension Fund
Consolidated Defendant:
Michael L. Smith, Ronald A. Williams, Richard J. Schnall and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Corvex Master Fund LP and Corvex Select Equity Master Fund LP
Not Classified By Court:
Wells Capital Management, Inc.
Interested Party:
KPMG, LLP
Petitioner:
Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund, Michael Avenia, CFG Custom Portfolio Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
John Baccus v. Brian Stirling
as 15-8030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN P. STIRLING, D. EASTRIDGE and OTHERS
Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 15-7358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY and others
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 9:2015cv02670
Plaintiff:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, D Eastridge and Others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Lee Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 14-7873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT WARD and others
Eastridge et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01444
Plaintiff:
David L. Eastridge and Janice D. Eastridge
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and Berryland Motors, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Eastridge et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2014xc01442
Plaintiff:
David L. Eastridge and Janice D. Eastridge
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and Berryland Motors, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
