Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Williams et al v. Tava Ventures Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Sonja N Williams and ShockTheory DLV Inc
Defendant:
Tava Ventures Inc, Tava Lifestyle LLC, LaCore Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Bealefield v. Odem et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Edward Bealefield
Defendant:
Whitney Odem, Chastiny D Harris and Donzell Labrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Tava Ventures Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Sonja N Williams, ShockTheory DLV, Inc. and ShockTheory DLV Inc
Defendant:
Tava Ventures, Inc., Tava Lifestyle, LLC, LaCore Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Harris v. Prosperity Bank
as 3:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Darin D Harris
Defendant:
Prosperity Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Cenlar FSB et al
as 4:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Rodney D. Harris
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB and CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harris v. Wayborn et al
as 4:2021cv01114
Plaintiff:
Charlton D. Harris
Defendant:
Sheriff FNU Wayborn, Officer FNU Ananti and Officer M. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilson v. Alvarez IV et.al.
as 3:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gilson
Defendant:
Carlos Lara, Matthew D. Harris, Jose Apodaca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Session v. Ware et al
as 6:2020cv01058
Defendant:
TDCJ Hughes Unit Officials, Robert Armour, Brittany Hartley and others
Plaintiff:
Tujuan Estaisyo Session
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Session v. Ware et al
as 1:2020cv00216
Defendant:
TDCJ Hughes Unit Officials, FNU Ware, Robert Armour and others
Plaintiff:
Tujuan Estaisyo Session
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
