Cases 1 - 10 of 53
House v. Racine County et al
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D House
Defendant:
Racine County, Haley Beren and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
House v. Kelly et al
as 1:2023cv16658
Plaintiff:
Ryan D. House
Defendant:
Mike Kelly and Will County ADF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) O'Brien v. CDC, et al
as 2:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Kory O'Brien
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, California Medical Facility, D Hurtado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey House v. Nicholas Groth, et al
as 22-2490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY D. HOUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS GROTH, SCOTT M. KELAND, DONALD RYBARIK and others
House v. Klepel et al
as 2:2022cv00911
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D House
Defendant:
City of Racine Police Department, Nicholas Groth, Craig Klepel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Cordova v. Hurtado et al
as 2:2022cv01296
Plaintiff:
Manuel Cardova and Manuel Cordova
Defendant:
D. Hurtado, M. Vidales, N. Ikeebu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65208
Plaintiff:
JERRY D HOUSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43223
Plaintiff:
JAMES D HOUSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv08158
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
YUMA D HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61940
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
YUMA D HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
