Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Johnson v. Stokes
as 5:2012cv02996
Plaintiff:
Markus D Johnson
Defendant:
Stokes and Bossier Max
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerrod Johnson v. Winn Correctional Center
as 12-31183
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERROD D. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM KEITH, Warden, Winnfield Correctional Center
Johnson v. Bright et al
as 5:2012cv00935
Defendant:
Kenneth Bright, Jr., Classification Staff of Hearing, Sylvia H. Cortez and others
Plaintiff:
Kent D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senrick Wilkerson v. State of Texas, et al
as 12-10830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, Dallas County Courts, BROOKE GRONA-ROBB, State Prosecutor and CALVIN D JOHNSON, Defense Lawyer
Johnson v. Winn Correctional Center
as 1:2012cv02134
Plaintiff:
Jerrod D Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Winn Correctional Center
as 5:2012cv02134
Plaintiff:
Jerrod D Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkerson v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2012cv01830
Plaintiff:
Senrick Shern Wilkerson
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Brooke Grona-Robb and Calvin D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Senrick Wilkerson v. Brooke, et al
as 12-10301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON, also known as Sen
Defendant - Appellee:
BROOKE, DA, Prosecuting Attorney, MICHAEL MCMURRAY, Detective, Dallas Police Department, CALVIN D JOHNSON, Attorney at Law and others
Yergenson v. Phillips et al
as 2:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Harold LeMarr Yergenson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bobby Phillips, Melisa Lea, Rick Looney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Johnson v. State of Mississippi
as 11-60567
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE D. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
