Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Johnson v. IRS et al
as 1:2013cv00385
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
IRS, N.C. Unemployment, Virginia Employment Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8701 Federal Employee's Group Life Insurance Act
Johnson v. Henrico Co. Govt. et al
as 1:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
Henrico Co. Govt., Lance Watson and DMV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meredith v. Elliot et al
as 7:2012cv00450
Defendant:
Robin L. Elliot, Dwight D. Johnson and Nicholas Simopoulos
Plaintiff:
Bradley Brian Meredith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rappahannock Regional Jail, et al
as 2:2012cv00479
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson
Defendant:
Medical Staff Nurse, Rappahannock Regional Jail and Joseph Higgs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Colmen et al
as 2:2012cv00480
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
George Colmen, Officer Steward and William Childs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2011cv00134
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lashan D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Mullins et al
as 7:2011cv00249
Counter Defendant:
Allen D. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Johnson
Defendant:
Dennis Mullins and Retail Echelon Installations Group
Counter Claimant:
Retail Echelon Installations Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2011cv00353
Petitioner:
Antonio D. Johnson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00100
Plaintiff:
Donnell D. Johnson
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Anita Bryant, E. R. Barksdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
