Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Mullins v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ralph J. Mullins
Defendant:
Cranston D. Johnson, Steve Andryzcik, Edie Viola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Hudgins
as 5:2021cv00106
Petitioner:
Keith D. Johnson
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00070
Petitioner:
Keith D. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2019cv00646
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michelle D. Johnson and Tim Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomashek v. Raleigh County Emergency Operating Center et al
as 2:2017cv01904
Plaintiff:
Philip J. Tomashek, II
Defendant:
Raleigh County Emergency Operating Center , John Zilinski , Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05275
Plaintiff:
Jody M. Johnson and Michael D. Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03606
Plaintiff:
Melissa D. Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12604
Plaintiff:
Melissa D. Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv07883
Plaintiff:
Alisha D. Johnson and Marshall Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23968
Plaintiff:
Maureen Johnson and William D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
