Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Mills v. May
as 5:2024cv00680
Petitioner:
Phil D. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Wallace
as 3:2023cv02284
Petitioner:
Shad D. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darrell Wayne Butler v. R. Mercado, et al
as 23-11490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL WAYNE BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
R. MERCADO, Warden, individual and official capacity, C. SBOTO, Assistant Warden, individual and official capacity, MCCORKAL, Shift Supervisor, individual and official capacity and others
Butler v. Mercado et al
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Butler
Defendant:
R. Mercado, C. Sboto, McCorkal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Wilson et al
as 3:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Andre Lyneal Wallace
Defendant:
Warden Wilson, D. Mills, C. Grider and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Meeks v. Norman et al
as 4:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Malcolm A. Meeks
Defendant:
Officer J. Norman and Breanna D. Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Reed et al
as 5:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Mills and Christopher Durrence Mills
Defendant:
Sarah Reed, A. B. Atkinson, Sumter C.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Reed et al
as 5:2021cv00309
Respondent:
Lt. Sarah Reed and Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Reed et al
as 1:2021cv22036
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Mills
Defendant:
Lt. Sarah Reed and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. May
as 5:2020cv00307
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Petitioner:
Phil D. Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
