Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 115
SMITH et al v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00246
Defendant: ACME TOOLS and BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.
Plaintiff: DONNA SMITH and GLYNN D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Hill
as 1:2019cv00440
Plaintiff: June D. Smith and Billy Ray Smith
Defendant: Luke Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. FBI
as 3:2019cv00018
Defendant: FBI
Plaintiff: THOMAS D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FBI OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 3:2018cv00210
Defendant: FBI OF PITTSBURGH and ISSAC HASSEN
Plaintiff: THOMAS D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dongarra v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01939
Plaintiff: Jordon Dongarra
Defendant: Officer D. Smith and S.I.S. Worker on camera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. FBI
as 3:2018cv00194
Defendant: FBI
Plaintiff: THOMAS D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Giant Food Stores, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00023
Plaintiff: Phyllis D. Smith and Edward W. Smith
Defendant: Giant Food Stores, LLC , Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH et al v. POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00238
Plaintiff: GARY D. SMITH, JR. and JULIE SMITH
Defendant: POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC. and HOFFMANS SPORTS & TURF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v.FBI
as 3:2017cv00146
Plaintiff: THOMAS D. SMITH
Defendant: FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI v. ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC et al
as 2:2017cv01466
Plaintiff: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant: ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC , RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHCHIE DE SILVA , SUKETU P. UPADHYAY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?