Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
SCHROEDER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04559
Plaintiff: ANDREW D SCHROEDER
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ryan v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05111
Plaintiff: John Ryan
Defendant: Natus Medical Incorporated, Thomas J. Sullivan, Joshua H. Levine and others
Johnson v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv00795
Plaintiff: William Johnson
Defendant: Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Mortman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04951
Plaintiff: Frederick Mortman
Defendant: Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Waterman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03341
Plaintiff: Marc Waterman
Defendant: Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03302
Plaintiff: Matthew Whitfield
Defendant: Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Stein v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04423
Plaintiff: Shiva Stein
Defendant: Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Schallman v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04391
Plaintiff: Nanci Schallman
Defendant: Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Derrick Allen, Sr. v. L. Auld We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2289
Plaintiff / Appellant: DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD and DISTRICT COURT JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
COMPTON v. MILLS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00811
Plaintiff: TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant: JUDGE J. MILLS and JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?