Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Maciel v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2016cv00996
Plaintiff:
Armando Maciel
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, S. Frauenheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
D.B. et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01186
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , Pfizer International Inc. , J.B. Roerig & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
D.B., a minor and Julie Parmley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Krzysztof Wolinski v. Acosta et al
as 1:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
Krzysztof Wolinski
Defendant:
N. Acosta, M. Zepeda and D.B. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.B. Sales Inc -v- Ramy F. Mukssood, et al.
as 2:2014cv04610
Plaintiff:
D.B. Sales Inc
Defendant:
Does, Ramy F. Mukssood and RG Development Company
D.B. sales inc. d/b/a Badass Jewelry v. Mukssood et al
as 2:2014cv04593
Plaintiff:
D.B. sales inc. d/b/a Badass Jewelry
Defendant:
Ramy F Mukssood and RG Development Company
K. W., et al v. Richard Armstrong, et al
as 14-35296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
K. W., by his next friend D.W., C. M., C. L. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD ARMSTRONG, in his official capacity as Director of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, PAUL LEARY, in his official capacity as Medicaid Administrator of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE, a department of the State of Idaho
McKenzie v. Banuelos et al
as 1:2014cv00434
Plaintiff:
Gustavo McKenzie
Defendant:
E. Banuelos , L. Gallardo , G. Stoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. Banuelos et al
as 1:2014at00200
Plaintiff:
Gustavo McKenzie
Defendant:
E. Banuelos , L. Gallardo , G. Stoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
