Cases 1 - 10 of 3,739
DAS v. IROBOT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv11158
Plaintiff:
DYLAN DAS
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle and JULIE ZEILER
Gomes Calixto v. Garland
as 24-1151
Petitioner:
NACIPE GOMES CALIXTO, JULIANA DA SILVA GUEDES and MARIA ALICE GUEDES CALIXTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
West-Bogans v. Guido et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Angela West-Bogans and Angela West
Defendant:
Judge Edward Guido, Judge Claudia Brewbaker, Judge Albert Masland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vandecarlos Nascimento, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1788
Petitioner:
VANDECARLOS FERREIRA DO NASCIMENTO, SANDRA MORERIRA DA SILVA, K. M. D.N. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Das v. Medvin, et al
as 3:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
Damodar Chandra Das
Defendant:
John Doe and Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAALIH v. PITTSBURGH POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
ABDUL HAKEEM SAALIH
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH POLICE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DA'S OFFICE, PITTSBURGH POLICE REVIEW BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Thomas Palmer
as 24-4222
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS WELDON PALMER, a/k/a Flame, a/k/a Jynx, a/k/a Jynx Da Don
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
