Cases 1 - 10 of 16
ADAMS v. CITY OF HARRISON, ARKANSAS et al
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF HARRISON, ARKANSAS, JERRY JACKSON, BURR ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ADAMS v. HEAD et al
as 1:2021cv02670
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRIS HEAD, JOHN EOFF, MARY JEAN CREAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. MCCONNELL
as 1:2020cv03072
Defendant:
MITCH A. MCCONNELL, JR.
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. Champaign County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv02320
Defendant:
Larry Zonfrilli, Unknown Champaign County Sheriff's Police Officers, Allen Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) et al
as 1:2018cv01583
Defendant:
PAUL J. MCNULTY, JAMES G. ROCHE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS et al
as 1:2014cv01781
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS and PAUL K. HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Bharara et al
as 1:2012cv07337
Plaintiff:
Dale B. Adams and Cherie L. Adams
Defendant:
Preet Bharara, George Bush, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. United States Department of Justice
as 3:2012cv03083
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Adams v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2012cv03012
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Deborah Groom, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. US Government
as 2:2011cv02295
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
