Cases 1 - 10 of 64
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01745
Plaintiff:
Alton D Brown
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Daniel Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 16-4135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN E. WETZEL, DANIEL BURNS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
MARGARET GORDAN
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
BROWN v. WOLF et al
as 2:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, JOHE E. WETZEL, DANIEL BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 16-2497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
In re: Alton D. Brown
as 16-1546
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, DANIEL BURNS, TIMOTHY S. RINGLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE and C.O. FRANK
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JAUN R. SANCHEZ
BROWN v. WOLF et al
as 2:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNS et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05526
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BURNS and KATINA BURNS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
