Cases 21 - 30 of 85
BROWN v. WOLF et al
as 2:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNS et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05526
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BURNS and KATINA BURNS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
YUMIL PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM, REV. PHIL MAUST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DiPietro v. The Department of Corrections and Its Employees Listed Herein et al
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nicodemo DiPietro
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and Its Employees Listed Herein, Daniel Mienert, John T. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTOS v. BURNS et al
as 2:2015cv01649
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM SANTOS
Defendant:
DANIEL BURNS, WENDY HASBULICH, IELAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. WETZEL
as 3:2014cv00272
Plaintiff:
YUMIL PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, REV. PHIL MAUST, DEPUTY SECRETARY DANIEL BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTEN v. WILLIG et al
as 1:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MARTEN
Defendant:
ROBERT A. WILLIG, DANIEL BURNS, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2014cv01390
Petitioner:
Gerald Wright
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Daniel Burns and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv07427
Petitioner:
WILLIE F. HILL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DANIEL BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
