Cases 1 - 10 of 12
NEVILLE v. SUELZER et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Not Yet Classified:
TINA NEVILLE, MG Thomas Suelzer, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Plaintiff:
TINA ANN NEVILLE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. SUELZER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin Akerman v. Daniel Hokanson
as 22-2154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL DANIEL R. HOKANSON, General, Chief, National Guard Bureau, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Department of the Army, FRANK KENDALL, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Akerman v. Hokanson et al
as 1:2022cv01258
Plaintiff:
Martin Akerman
Defendant:
General Daniel R. Hokanson, Christine E. Wormuth, Frank Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Virnig v. National Guard Bureau et al
as 5:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Florence Virnig
Defendant:
National Guard Bureau, General Daniel R. Hokanson and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe v. Austin et al
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Christine Wormuth, Daniel R. Hokanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Virnig v. National Guard Bureau et al
as 3:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Florence Virnig
Defendant:
National Guard Bureau and General Daniel R. Hokanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROBERTS v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv01797
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHN P. ROTH, DANIEL R. HOKANSON, DOROTHY A. HOGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
