Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Daniel Ramirez v. Hertz Local Edition Corp. et al
as 2:2020cv00061
Defendant:
Hertz Local Edition Transporting, Inc., Does 1 to 100, inclusive and Hertz Local Edition Corp.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel Ramirez-Medina v. USDHS, et al
as 19-36034
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL RAMIREZ-MEDINA
Daniel Ramirez-Medina v. William Barr
as 19-72850
Petitioner:
DANIEL RAMIREZ-MEDINA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Ramirez v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv04834
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ramirez
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. Hertz Local Edition Corp. et al
as 3:2019cv03782
Defendant:
Hertz Local Edition Transporting, Inc. and Hertz Local Edition Corp.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Daniel Ramirez v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05305
Defendant:
Samsung Electrionics America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ramirez
Cross Defendant:
Amperex Technology Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Francisco Ramirez-Olivares v. William Barr
as 19-70606
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO DANIEL RAMIREZ-OLIVARES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Ramirez v. HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
as 4:2019cv00063
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
Paul Daniel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shreves v. Harris et al
as 6:2018cv00097
Defendant:
Michael Bury, Michael Zuber, Chris Conell and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Shreves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01761
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
