Cases 1 - 10 of 28
HOWELL v. STATE OF INDIANA, et al.
as 1:2016cv01377
Defendant:
SHANI ANDERSON, KEITH BUTTS, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2014cv00134
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY and DANIEL RODDEN
Plaintiff:
U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
PREWITT v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2014cv00061
Defendant:
KEVIN BRANHAM, DENISE BROOKS, RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL L. PREWITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. RODDEN
as 4:2014cv00027
Defendant:
DANIEL RODDEN
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTIAGO v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2013cv00160
Defendant:
DENISE BROOKS, CLARK COUNTY JAIL NURSES ____ BROOKS AND MIKE _____, CLARK COUNTY JAIL STAFF JOHN DOES/JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTIAGO v. RODDEN et al
as 1:2013cv00585
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY JAIL NURSES ____ BROOKS AND MIKE _____, CLARK COUNTY JAIL STAFF JOHN DOES/JANE DOES and DANIEL RODDEN
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. RODDEN
as 1:2011cv01717
Defendant:
DANIEL RODDEN
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOWELL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2010cv00981
Defendant:
JESSICA ALLEN, GREGORY BALLARD, CARL BRIZZI and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RHODES v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00024
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, NURSE PRACTITIONER DENISE BROOKS, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNDERWOOD v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
GARY WILLIAM UNDERWOOD
Defendant:
DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
