Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WYNKOOP v. AVONWORTH SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
HARRY WYNKOOP
Defendant:
AVONWORTH SCHOOL DISTRICT, DR. JEFF HADLEY, YU-LING CHENG-BEHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARCURI et al v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2020cv05408
Defendant:
SEAN GORMAN, TIARE NIMMO-LEE, YOUNGSHIL DUNBAR and others
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J ARCURI and MELANIE ARCURI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEROZA-BENITEZ v. SMITH et al
as 5:2017cv03980
Defendant:
C.I. MICHAEL PERKINS, C.I. NICHOLAS EPOLITO, C.I. DANIEL WHITE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO BENITEZ-PEROZA and JOSE ANTONIO PEROZA-BENITEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALHOUN v. CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2016cv02448
Plaintiff:
TIA RENEE CALHOUN
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, DANIEL WHITE, POLICE OFFICER JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv02966
Petitioner:
DANIEL WHITE
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63695
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DANIEL WHITE and THELMA H. HILLARD WHITE
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2009cv01494
Plaintiff:
Daniel White
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WHITE v. FORD MOTOR CO. et al
as 2:2008cv68778
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WHITE
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR CO., FORD MOTOR CO., FORD MOTOR CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WHITE et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62271
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WHITE, ETHEL WHITE, ETHEL WHITE and others
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
