Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13918
Plaintiff:
DARRELL MURPHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09286
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez et al v. State Farm LLoyds et al
as 5:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez and Angeles Diaz
Defendant:
State Farm LLoyds and Darrell Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kawamoto et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2016cv01126
Plaintiff:
Albert Kawamoto and Kathleen Kawamoto
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds , Darrell Murphy and Walter Viermann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Qualls v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Eric Qualls
Defendant:
Debra Johnson, Darrell Murphy, Jason Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BMC MetalWorks, LLC v. All-States Machine Repair, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
BMC MetalWorks, LLC
Defendant:
All-States Machine Repair, LLC , Ralph A. Cash , Robert J. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frazier v. Schofield et al
as 1:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Torrey Frazier
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Brenda Jones and Darrell Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2011cv03798
Plaintiff:
Justin Darrell Murphy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ezell v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County et al
as 3:2011cv00405
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Ezell
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Metropolitan Council, Karl Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Darrell Murphy
as 09-10696
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRELL MURPHY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
