Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Hunter v. Paterson, et al.
as 24-1291
Plaintiff:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Defendant:
STATE MEDIA PERPETRATORS, RICK ALFREAD MANDEVILLE, SCOTT JONES and others
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David M Hunter, Tyler Cantrell, Mackenzie Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Hunter v. Patterson, et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Plaintiff:
David Hunter and David Sampson Hunter
Defendant:
State Media Perpetrators, Rick Alfread Mandeville, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hunter v. Scott Jones
as 23-15136
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT R. JONES
HUNTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18806
Plaintiff:
DAVID BLAINE HUNTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Hunter v. Scott Jones
as 22-15437
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT JONES
Hunter v. Lumpkin
as 21-20599
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Alexander Hunter
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ruth Hunter, et al v. Rhino Shield, et al
as 21-3748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUTH A. HUNTER and MARK D. HUNTER, Executor of Estate of David G. Hunter, Deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
RHINO SHIELD, JAMES H. WILLIAMS, STEVEN C. DOMINIQUE and others
Defendant:
JOHN D. ROBERTSON
Hedrington v. County of Solano et al
as 2:2021at00195
Plaintiff:
Orlonzo Hedrington
Defendant:
Joseph Shy, Broadus Z. Atkins, James Isaac Mendoza and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PS) Hedrington v. County of Solano et al
as 2:2021cv00414
Plaintiff:
Orlonzo Hedrington
Defendant:
Joseph Shy, Broadus Z. Atkins, James Isaac Mendoza and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
