Cases 1 - 10 of 26
JOHNSON et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv00636
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. JOHNSON and PAULA JOHNSON
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Estus v. Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Tammy Estus
Defendant:
David Edward Johnson and Lessors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2016cv01068
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2015cv01127
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv01531
Plaintiff:
David T Johnson
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOHNSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY- CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2014cv00857
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY- CITY OF PITTSBURGH, MS. KATE BARKMAN, HON. KATHLEEN A. DURKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Ebbert
as 3:2014cv01218
Petitioner:
David R. Johnson
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. ERGON WEST VIRGINIA, INC.
as 2:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ERGON WEST VIRGINIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JOHNSON v. THE PHILADELPHIA DETENTION CENTER & IT'S MEDICAL STAFF
as 2:2013cv06200
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEVINE JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA DETENTION CENTER & IT'S MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
