Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vasbinder v. Evangelidis et al
as 4:2024cv40017
Plaintiff:
William J. Vasbinder
Defendant:
Lewis Evangelidis, David Tuttle, Christopher Brothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew v. LastPass US LP et al
as 1:2023cv10338
Plaintiff:
David Andrew
Defendant:
LastPass US LP and GoTo Technologies USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Debt Cleanse Group Legal Services, LLC v. GoTo Technologies USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv12047
Plaintiff:
Debt Cleanse Group Legal Services, LLC and Steven Carter
Defendant:
GoTo Technologies USA, Inc. and LastPass US LP
Consolidated Plaintiff:
R. Andre Klein, David Andrew, Steven Linthicum and others
Consolidated Defendant:
LastPass USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Hillman et al
as 1:2021cv11704
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Judge Timothy S. Hillman, Judge Sidney Hanlon and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Evangelidas et al
as 4:2020cv40153
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Sherriff Lewis Evangelidas, Dr. David Andrews and Attorney Katherine Ismeurt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boisvert v. Healy et al
as 4:2019cv40132
Defendant:
Amy D., Andrew Abdella, Maura Healy and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Patrick Boisvert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalika vs Boston & Maine Corporation etal.,
as 1:2015cv14043
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Kalika and Kalika, LLC
Defendant:
Boston & Maine Corporation, Pan Am Railways, inc., Public Service of New Hampshire and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PAN AM SYSTEMS INC et al v. HARDENBERGH et al
as 2:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
PAN AM SYSTEMS INC , SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY and DAVID ANDREW FINK
Defendant:
CHALMERS HARDENBERG, CM HARDENBERG PA and ATLANTIC NORTHEAST RAILS AND PORTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
