Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Ellis v. Specialty Orthopedic Group of Mississippi, PLLC et al
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Andy Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Specialty Orthopedic Group of Mississippi, PLLC, David Andrew Vecchione, M.D., Medtronic, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Regions Bank dba Regions Mortgage v. Fernandez et al
as 6:2022cv00743
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank dba Regions Mortgage and Regions Bank doing business as Regions Mortgage
Defendant:
David Andrew Fernandez, Daryl Andrew Fernandez, Carolyn Fernandez Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Diehl
as 22-50100
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Andrew Diehl, also known as David A. Diehl
Johnson v. Kinard et al
as 3:2021cv00364
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
John D Kinard, Henry A. Trochesset, Galveston County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Trochesset et al
as 3:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
Henry A Trochesset, Galveston County Jail, Dr. Garry Killyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Svochak v. Cockrell
as 4:2021cv00482
Defendant:
David Andrew Cockrell
Plaintiff:
Jan Svochak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Luebkeman v. Woodsprings Inn & Suites Hotel
as 3:2020cv01444
Defendant:
Woodsprings Inn & Suites Hotel
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Luebekam and David Andrew Luebkeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renson v. Davis et al
as 6:2020cv00297
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Renson
Defendant:
TDCJ Pardons and Parole, Lorie Davis and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2019cv00497
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Renson
Defendant:
FNU Warran
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
