Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BASF Corporation v. Auto Collision Experts, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00132
Defendant:
Larry Parker, Auto Collision Experts, LLC and David Baker
Plaintiff:
BASF Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Braden v. Moore et al
as 2:2017cv02206
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ranard Braden
Defendant:
Robert Moore, Shannon Green, Andrew Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Tennessee, State of et al
as 3:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Joseph David Baker
Defendant:
Tennessee, State of , Tennessee Rehabilitative Initiative in Correction , Roger Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smiley v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction, Veit Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braden v. Haslam et al
as 2:2016cv02346
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ranard Braden
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Derrick Schofield, Darren Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Danielle M White, John No. 1 Doe and John No. 2 Doe
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Petitioner:
Danielle M White
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Corrections Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Danielle M White
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Corrections Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krug v. Baker et al
as 3:2011cv00645
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Krug
Defendant:
R. David Baker and David R. Heroux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Baker
as 2:2009cv02381
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Baker, jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Promissory Note
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
