Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hollowell v. Byrne
as 1:2022cv01832
Petitioner:
JoVon Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
David Byrne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horvath v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv01413
Petitioner:
Alexander Horvath
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Michael S. Yeager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
RHODES v. USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02165
Plaintiff:
JASON W RHODES
Defendant:
USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, DAVID BYRNE and EAN HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Carruth v. David Byrne, et al
as 18-13272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DEE CARRUTH, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
LEWIS SMYTH WINTER FORD LLC, a domestic limited liability company, ALBERT G. LEWIS, III, an individual and JUSTICE D. SMYTH, III, "Jay", an individual
Defendant:
DAVID BYRNE, an individual, GERALD H. ALLEN, Senator, an individual, SARAH MOORE, an individual and others
Carruth v. Bentley et al
as 7:2017cv01445
Plaintiff:
John Dee Carruth
Defendant:
Robert J. Bentley and David Byrne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alabama One Credit Union et al v. Byrne et al
as 7:2015cv01089
Plaintiff:
Alabama One Credit Union and John Dee Carruth
Defendant:
David Byrne , Gerald H Allen, Sarah Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrnes v. Department of Corrections
as 4:2011cv10035
Plaintiff:
David Byrnes
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byrnes v. Department of Corrections
as 0:2011cv60646
Plaintiff:
David Byrnes
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byrne et al v. Crist et al
as 8:2010cv01187
Plaintiff:
David Byrne and Index Music, Inc.
Defendant:
Charlie Crist, XYZ Companies, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
