Cases 1 - 10 of 12
v. City of Torrance et al
as 2:2020cv04718
Defendant:
Mark Pittman, Branden Nakashima, David Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchel Zohner v. City of Torrance et al
as 2:2020cv04719
Defendant:
MARK PITTMAN, BRANDEN NAKASHIMA, CITY OF TORRANCE, a public entity and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHEL ZOHNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2019cv03239
Plaintiff:
David Chandler
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian Anthony Provost v. Bryn Fedderson et al
as 8:2019cv00666
Defendant:
Bryn Fedderson, David Chandler, J. Ackerman and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Provost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
Wei v. Chandler et al
as 4:2018cv02578
Plaintiff:
Liqiang Wei
Defendant:
David Chandler and Oxford University Press
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Salma Agha-Khan, et al v. Bank of America, et al
as 17-17262
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, CITIMORTGAGE INC. and others
In re: Salma Agha-Khan v. Bank of America, et al
as 17-71883
:
In re: SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Petitioner:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
BRETT P. RYAN, JONATHAN J. DAMEN, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
