Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Oppenheimer v. Coffee County Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Coffee County Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. Leadership Artists, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00954
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Leadership Artists, LLC and Brian K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. 321 Properties, LLC et al (JRG1)
as 3:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
321 Properties, LLC, Neel Patel and Satish Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. 3rd Home Limited Co.
as 3:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
3rd Home Limited Co.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Gordon v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al
as 5:2021cv01097
Defendant:
Hollow Center Packing Co., John Doe (1 through 100), BASF Catalysts LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon and David W. Gordon, Sr.
Cross Claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merlitti v. University of Akron et al
as 5:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
Tonya Merlitti
Defendant:
University of Akron, Greenleaf Family Center , Angela M. Richmond-Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 5:2018cv00252
Defendant:
University of Akron, Greenleaf Family Center, Angela M. Richmond-Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00383
Plaintiff:
Felton E. Lewis, III
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation, Kilpatrick Townsend, Jackson Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Ream v. Thomas Bell
as 12-1463
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID GORDON REAM
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS K. BELL
Parshall v. Gordon
as 2:2012cv00329
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Parshall
Defendant:
G. David Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
