Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hill v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12519
Plaintiff:
David Hill
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pryor et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11530
Defendant:
Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. , FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Pryor , Nancy Mackinnon , James Leathers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ahern, et al v. O'Keefe, et al
as 14-2329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD AHERN, KAI KUNZ and WILLIAM XI PROPERTIES SERIES, LLC
Defendant:
ANTHONY JOSEPH SCOLA, RONALD MCQUINN, KELLER WILLIAMS NORTH CENTRAL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLE O'KEEFE, DANIEL LORING, MARK KAVANACH and others
US v. Lasseque
as 14-2079
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LASSEQUE, a/k/a David Lassegue, a/k/a Dollar, a/k/a David Lassague, a/k/a Winston Brooks, a/k/a David Hill
Interested Party:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
US v. Lasseque
as 14-2026
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LASSEQUE, a/k/a Dollar, a/k/a David Lassague, a/k/a David Lassegue, a/k/a Winston Brooks, a/k/a David Hill
Ahern et al v. Scola et al
as 4:2012cv40096
Plaintiff:
Edward Ahern and Kai Kunz
Defendant:
Anthony Scola, Sheila McQuinn, Ronald McQuinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sonia v. Brookline, Town of et al
as 1:2011cv10666
Plaintiff:
Robert Sonia
Defendant:
Brookline, Town of, David Hill, Brendan Kelleher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-9006
Creditor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hills v. Fletcher
as 1:2008cv00158
Plaintiff:
David Hills and David Hills
Defendant:
Joseph E Fletcher
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
