Cases 1 - 5 of 5
David Munchinski v. Gerald Solomon, et al
as 17-2633
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID JOSEPH MUNCHINSKI
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALD S. SOLOMON, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Fayette County, Pennsylvania and in his individual capacity and RALPH C. WARMAN, in his official capacitites as First Assistant District Attorney and District Attorney of Fayette County, Pennsylvania and in his individual capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. KOPAS, III, in his official capacity as First Assistant District Attorney of Fayette County and in his individual capacity and DANA L. FAYOCK, Executrix of the Estate of George Fayock
David Munchinski v. Gerald Solomon
as 14-4158
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID JOSEPH MUNCHINSKI
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALD S. SOLOMON, In His Official Capacity as District Attorney of Fayette County, Pennsylvania and His Individual Capacity and RALPH C. WARMAN, In His Official Capacities as Fisrt Assistant Distrct Attorney and District Attorney of Fayette County, Pennsylvania and His Individual Capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. KOPAS, III, In His Official Capacity as Fisrt Assistant District Attorney of Fayette County and His Individual Capacity and DANA L. FAYOCK, Executrix of the Estate of George Fayock
David Munchinski v. Harry Wilson, et al
as 11-3416
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID JOSEPH MUNCHINSKI
Defendant - Appellant:
HARRY WILSON, Warden of the State Correctional Institute of Fayette and ATTY GEN PA
In re: David Munchinski, et al
as 09-3540
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DAVID JOSEPH MUNCHINSKI
Defendant - Respondent:
HARRY WILSON and ATTY GEN PA
MUNCHINSKI v. WILSON et al
as 2:2007cv01712
Petitioner:
DAVID JOSEPH MUNCHINSKI
Respondent:
HARRY WILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
