Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023ct03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2022ct03138
Plaintiff:
David Lee Smith
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Lexis Publishing, Nancy S. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
David Lee Smith
Defendant:
Heath Jackson, Lt. Richard Hetrick, Wade L. Hartly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2018cv00618
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
TERRENCE BOYLE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JOSHUA A. STEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STAMPELOS et al
as 4:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CHARLES STAMPELOS, JAMES HANKINSON, RON FLURY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LEON COUNTY FLORIDA, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, JAMES HANKINSO and LEON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Smith v. James Dever, III
as 17-6672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. DEVER, III and TERRENCE W. BOYLE
David Smith v. State of North Carolina
as 17-6275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and BRYAN WELLS
David Smith v. Graham Mullens, et al
as 16-5205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Lee Smith, And all others similiarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Graham C. Mullens, U.S. Judge, Pat McCrory, N.C. Governor and Billy Bryant, Lee County Sheriff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
