Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brown v. Turbyfill
as 3:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
Isiah Brown
Defendant:
David Matthew Turbyfill and Roger L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Cregger et al
as 7:2020cv00467
Defendant:
J. T. Cregger, G. Berry, G. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
David Matthew Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kessler et al v. City of Charlottesville et al
as 3:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Tarron J. Richardson, Al S. Thomas, City of Charlottesville and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Kessler and David Matthew Parrott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kessler et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Matthew Parrot, Elliot Kline, East Coast Knights of The Ku Klux Klan and others
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. Piedmont Regional Jail Board of Directors et al
as 1:2018cv00331
Plaintiff:
David Matthew Rose
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Board of Directors, James Garnett, Jr., Donald Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sines et al v. Kessler et al
as 3:2017cv00072
Defendant:
Matthew Heimbach, Nationalist Front, Augustus Sol Invictus and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3, Marissa Blair, John Doe and others
Petitioner:
David Duke, James Hart Stern, Denise Y. Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
McKinney v. Walrath et al
as 3:2017cv00103
Petitioner:
David Matthew McKinney
Respondent:
John Walrath, Harold W. Clark and Mark Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Wormer v. Clarke
as 1:2013cv01496
Petitioner:
David Matthew Van Wormer
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinney v. Ray
as 3:2007cv00266
Petitioner:
David Matthew McKinney
Respondent:
Tracy Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Ray
as 7:2007cv00218
Petitioner:
David Matthew McKinney
Respondent:
Tracy Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
